The New World Order international
|
|
As an introduction: Never before…
Nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion: But here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is. Joseph, Comte de Maistre, (1753–1821)
Mr. Obama always was and remains merely the pen with which at this moment others are charting the serpentine course for "the destruction of the U.S. Constitutional Republic" ¬ just as Bush, Clinton, and other real Presidents were only temporary figureheads on a ship of state they did not actually captain, sailing to a destination to which perhaps they were not even privy. Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
It's worse than conspiracy – it's consensus. - Vladimir Bukovskiy
The upper classes of Britain at least once defended their own country and culture, even if in a more cynical view they were defending their own privilege. Now they can't or won't even do that: such is the intellectual rot that has permeated every class and every party in England. - (wileyvet)
There has been a national policy going back to the 1920s to hide the crimes of the Communists, especially Russian Communists. - Dr. Joseph Douglass
The American people, especially the patriotic ones, simply do not want to hear or believe any bad news about their country. - Eric Samuelson
The downfall of capitalism will not come from the uprising of an impoverished working class but from the sabotage of a bored upper class. This was the view of the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942. Schumpeter believed that at some point in the future, an educated elite would have nothing left to struggle for and will instead start to struggle against the very system that they themselves live in. - Ralph Schoellhammer |
|
When we see the attachment of savages to their lawless freedom, preferring ceaseless combat to subjection to a lawful constraint which they might establish, and thus preferring senseless freedom to rational freedom, we regard it with deep contempt as barbarity, rudeness, and a brutish degradation of humanity. Accordingly, one would think that civilized people (each united in a state) would hasten all the more to escape, the sooner the better, from such a depraved condition. But, instead, each state places its majesty (for it is absurd to speak of the majesty of the people) in being subject to no external juridical restraint, and the splendor of its sovereign consists in the fact that many thousands stand at his command to sacrifice themselves for something that does not concern them and without his needing to place himself in the least danger. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch (Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf), 1795 by Immanuel Kant. |
The New World Order (NWO) is a cumulative expression for a vague and very narrow international party (an International) comprised of the most rich and powerful of this world, propagandized by Richard Cobden and established by Cecil Rhodes in the Great Britain (1800s). Yet Immanuel Kant contemplated this idea even earlier (see above).
Unlike the high classes in the past, concerned mostly about acquiring even more wealth and power under the then existing social order, this International also contemplates various ideas of changing the world (though not exactly in accordance with Marx). Their world goals spanned from the very "natural" things for their class such as increasing their profits (by exploiting semi-slave labor, unification, and leveling all nations to the lowest standards), to various "progressive" and bizarre causes (like the Frankfurt "school" of "cultural" Marxism) which undermine the Judeo-Christian foundations of the Western nations, to nurturing regimes antithetical to the Judeo-Christian values. Organizations such as the Round Table Group, the Trilateral Commission, the Conceal of Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Club are their departments, and the UN and EU – their dear creatures. Through them they extend their cadre and influence into governments, education, and near all social institutions.
However, the NWO activity of the recent decades went far beyond the profiteering or bizarre goals. The kind of remaking the West being implemented now is absolutely unprecedented. The NWO propaganda denies all the Western nations their right of self-determination, forcefully repopulating them with the least appropriate (islamic) foreigners. The NWO ideologues do away with the historic aspiration of all people to self-determination and with the fundamental principle that "Nation X belongs to people X". In a brilliant observation of E. M. Oblomov, what we see now is not merely the so common inability to learn from history, but it is a great unlearning of history of our age! And it is the primary NWO organizations – the EU and the UN – which effectuate this unlearning via such plans as "The replacement (!) migration" and the so called "UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration", doing away with nations of the West and the white race.
Generally, globalism of the NWO differs from the "raw" Marxism (even if feeding it now and then). It's interesting, however that...
· The contemporary globalism may be viewed as the next phase of Marxism, which "evolved" from expropriating wealth of rich and successful individuals to expropriating wealth and territory of whole nations (as it was prophesied in 1973 by Jean Raspail in "The camp of the Saints").
· Even technically this expropriation of nations is similar to the practices of Bolsheviks, which "compacted" the "too luxury" (in their view) apartments occupied by one household or one family with other families, so that different families were forced to share one apartment (called "communal apartment").
· One more way of expropriating wealth of whole nations is such an international scum as the tax for the so called "climate change" as though caused by the human industrial activities.
Says Robert
Bartley (the Wall Street Journal), a free trade zealot who championed a
five word amendment to the Constitution: There shall be open borders.
He also said: I think the nation-state is finished.
Speaks Gary Allen:
Everyone knows that Adolph Hitler
existed. The terror and destruction that this madman inflicted upon the world
are universally recognized. Hitler came from a poor family which had absolutely
no social position. He was a high school drop-out and nobody ever accused him
of being cultured. Yet this man tried to conquer the world. During his early
career he sat in a cold garret and poured onto paper his ambitions to rule the
world. We know that.
Similarly,
we know that a man named Vladimir Ilich Lenin also existed. Like Hitler, Lenin
did not spring from a family of social lions. The son of a petty bureaucrat,
Lenin, who spent most of his adult life in poverty, has been responsible for
the deaths of tens of millions of your fellow human beings and the enslavement
of nearly a billion more. Like Hitler, Lenin sat up nights in a dank garret
scheming how he could conquer the world. We know that too.
Is
it not theoretically possible that a billionaire could be sitting, not in a
garret, but in a penthouse, in Manhattan, London or Paris and dream the
same dream as Lenin and Hitler? You will have to admit it is theoretically
possible. Julius Caesar, a wealthy aristocrat, did. And such a man might form
an alliance or association with other like-minded men, might he not? Caesar
did. These men would be superbly educated, command immense social prestige and
be able to pool astonishing amounts of money to carry out their purposes. These
are advantages that Hitler and Lenin did not have.
Only the brightest and clairvoyant individuals could envisage the effects of bizarre "soul searching" of such dreamers born with a silver spoon. For example, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis in 1915 testified about the dangers that could arise from individuals and powerful philanthropic organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation with their controlling special interest influence masked as benevolence:
There develops within the State a state so powerful that the existing ordinary social and industrial forces are insufficient to cope with it. … Their power is inconsistent with our democratic aspirations.
Also, Ayn Rand noted, that "capitalists are the last group one can expect to fight for capitalism":
"As a group, businessmen have been withdrawing for decades from the ideological battlefield, disarmed by the deadly combination of altruism and Pragmatism. Their public policy has consisted in appeasing, compromising and apologizing: appeasing their crudest, loudest antagonists; compromising with any attack, any lie, any insult; apologizing for their own existence. Abandoning the field of ideas to their enemies, they have been relying on lobbying, i.e., on private manipulations, on pull, on seeking momentary favors from government officials. Today, the last group one can expect to fight for capitalism is the capitalists."
The same ideas and the same concerns about Rockefeller are expressed by the New York Mayor John Francis Hylan (1922)
Alas, nobody so far came with ideas what to do about that madness killing the Civilization (the Greek-Roman Judeo-Christian civilization).
The
main quotes of Professor Carroll Quigley
the author of "Tragedy and Hope",
1966
The
powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than
to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate
the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.
This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of
the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent
private meetings and conferences. (Georgetown University Professor Carroll
Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p. 324. 1966.)
There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international
Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right
believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as
the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or
any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this
network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two
years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no
aversion to it or to most of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past
and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of
opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history
is significant enough to be known. (Georgetown University Professor Carroll
Quigley, Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, p. 950. 1964.)
“The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which
originated in England [and] believes national boundaries should be obliterated
and one-world rule established.” (Georgetown University Professor Carroll
Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our Time, p. 95
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and
policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a
foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead,
the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can
‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or
extensive shifts in policy. (Georgetown University Professor Carroll
Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, pp. 1247-1248 )
A Patriot and
former CFR member speaks out (also here)
Johnny Eugine Stewart: F.R.E.E. Founder (by Eric
Samuelson)
"The
difference between Democrats and Republicans is: Democrats have accepted some
ideas of socialism cheerfully, while Republicans have accepted them reluctantly." (1962)
The fragments of the book "Tragedy and Hope" related to the quotes above
More very telling quotes (from SFTOBEY)
We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and
other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have
been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been
subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now
more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The
supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely
preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.
David Rockefeller, Bilderberger Conference, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal
working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my
family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the
world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one
world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405
We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major
crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.
David Rockefeller
Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore
order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were
told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or
promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of
the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man
fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will
be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them
by the World Government.
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1992
US must not stop Syrian resettlement. It would be a threat to ‘global
governance’.
David Miliband,
former British Foreign Secretary
who came to New York in 2013 to take the reins of the International Rescue
Committee
This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan, which calls for a
gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one
world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept.
Zbignew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter
I have often said that the use of a university is to
make young gentlemen as unlike their fathers as possible.
Woodrow Wilson, Princeton University, 1914
The purpose of a college education is to question your father's values.
James O. Freedman, Dartmouth College, 2002
Every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he
comes to school with certain allegiances to our founding fathers, toward our
elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being,
and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It's up to you
as teachers to make all these sick children well – by creating the
international child of the future.
Dr. Chester M. Pierce, Psychiatrist,
address to the Childhood International Education Seminar, 1973
To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men
their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and
religious dogmas…
G. Brock Chisholm, psychiatrist and co-founder of the World Federation of Mental Health
We ... ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference
from others ... . And that's precisely what the European Union, in my view,
should be doing its best to undermine.
States have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit
them"; "sovereignty is an illusion ... sovereignty is an absolute
illusion that has to be put behind us.
Peter Sutherland, UN migration chief & chairman at Goldman Sachs bank,
who wants to use (Muslim) immigration to destroy European countries’ culture
If we are frank with ourselves, we shall admit that we are engaged on a
deliberate and sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations upon the
sovereignty and independence of the fifty or sixty local sovereign independent
States which at present partition the habitable surface of the earth and divide
the political allegiance of mankind. It is just because we are really attacking
the principle of local sovereignty that we keep on protesting our loyalty to it
so loudly. … I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly
but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called
sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And
all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands…
Arnold Toynbee,
Address to the 1931 Copenhagen conference;
"International Affairs" , Journal of the Royal Institute of
International Affairs (November 1931)
It's hard to get rid of the
money in a way that does more good than harm. One of the ways is to subsidize
people who are trying to change the system and get rid of people like us. –
Says Laura Chasin Rockefeller (the 3rd generation) in "Foundations of
Betrayal: How the Liberal Super Rich Undermine America" by Phil Kent
See also "Roseanne, the Red Queen"
White men must be stopped: The very future of
mankind depends on it – Ms. Melinda
Gates (the wife of Bill Gates)
Bill Gates tries to cleanse math of 'white supremacy'
Those of us of European stock will be the
minority in less than two years, and, that's a good thing. – Joe Biden
I'm sorry I was born white and privileged. It
disgusts me. And I feel so much shame. – Rosanna
Arquette (Hollywood).
White supremacy is a transnational threat.
– António
Guterres (the UN secretary general)
"I think that there's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually and semantically correct than about being morally right." - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
A few sobering conclusions
"Premonition"
Decades
ago back in the 1970s of the former USSR (however long after the Stalin
nightmare) people did not fear their own shadows any more, and some aspects of
the grotesque Soviet political system could be already discussed (in kitchens).
Soviet propaganda machine typically bragged as though the Soviet political
system were the most democratic in the world (!) – that is while having only
one (Communist) party allowed, and always having only one no contest
candidate for each and every elected position at all levels!
Yet authors singing Hosanna about the Soviet freedom and elections did not even
realize the idiocy of their claims about such a grotesquely idiotic electoral
system!
In that time it came to my mind: Why do not the Soviet leaders agree to
maintain several (equally "loyal") candidates for every
position, and why do not they permit and maintain also a second party (a kind
of a communist too) – in order to offer a fake alternative and an
illusion of a choice in an illusion of election?! Then their bragging about
democratic elections would be formally valid, yet they would not lose even one
iota of their totalitarian control...
Little did I know then, that exactly such a system of fake parties and
their cadre of nomenclatura already existed in America, established
incrementally in small steps, near unnoticed by anybody, without any preceding
decades of Stalin terror and GULAGs... Shame to America! (But the American
people, especially the patriotic ones, simply do not want to hear or believe
any bad news about their country – Eric Samuelson).
Conclusions
The
reality of the new age with its enormous production potential is that some
individuals are capable to generate and own a wealth in a matter of tens of
billions dollars. Moreover, they can also establish international clubs,
international parties, and other organizations controlling near the entire
wealth of the world. Being in such a position, not only can they pursue the usual
goal of the rich to accumulate even more wealth, but they can also have and
pursue any kinds of unusual bizarre agendas in accordance with their
bizarre world views.
The
most sad and depressing part of it is that with such enormous financial means
they project their power onto every nation of their choice implementing the
desired changes and their bizarre world views unobstructed, without any
resistance. Moreover...
Beside
private clubs, there are also a few despotic or totalitarian nations
capable to easily redirect huge amounts of their national budgets into any kind
of nefarious "projects" undermining other nations. So did the former
Alas,
not much can be done in free and open nations of the West against such an
enormous financial, corrupting, and lobbing pressure from outside
coupled with the erosion of values and progressive sabotage from inside.
A normal method of resistance against such a destructive force in a
parliamentary republic supposed to be opposition parties fighting
against this destructive force, and at least a few congressmen representing and
speaking out for these parties in the parliament. To keep speaking out and to keep
the goals of this fight on the table is the very minimum required for winning
the fight in some future.
Unfortunately,
as of now, except the Judeo-Christian America party, we have not one truly
oppositional party, nor any congressmen speaking out for such a party.
Regretfully, the US Congress functions not much differently than the former
Soviet one party "Congress". This dysfunctional mode of operation was
achieved by various methods of ignoring or suppression of freedom of speech
examined in items 2-8 of FAQ. Thus, even that limited
potential of resistance against NWO which in theory is available in our
Republic, is disabled by this very NWO and the ill traditions of our political
system.
Therefore, the first thing to do is to abandon the idiotic deficiency of the
American political mindset (see FAQ), to establish
parties which do speak out, to elect at least one or two congressmen that do
speak out for such parties, and to resuscitate the real free speech and real
parliementarism. In a real parliementarism no issue can be tabooed or removed
from public discussions: on the contrary, all such issues are always on the
table and discussed as long as it takes. At the very least! Most of the tabooed
topics cannot withstand any honest discussion – and this is exactly the reason
why they got tabooed...
Alexander Gofen
More references
Klaus Schwab’s Young Global Leaders
Civilization 3.0
https://lewrockwell.com/2022/01/no_author/davos-man-and-open-borders/
https://chroniclesmagazine.org/davos-man-and-open-borders/
https://wnd.com/2022/02/hard-racial-truths-trudeau-biden-despise/
https://thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/world-focuses-ukraine-globalists-like-world-economic-forums-klaus-schwab-charge-ahead/
https://wnd.com/2022/09/world-economic-forum-official-belittles-conspiracy-theories-anti-globalists/
John Kennedy prophetic speech on April 27, 1961:
script,
audio
The institute that is plotting the collapse of Western civilization
https://wnd.com/2021/07/institute-plotting-collapse-western-civilization/
Jacques Attali:
Карфаген
должен быть
разрушен?
https://kstati.net/karfagen-dolzhen-byt-razrushen/
Yuval Noah Harari
https://kstati.net/v-belom-venchike-iz-roz/
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Jacques Attali
The Naked Communist Agenda (1958)
Never before...
Pope's
Bilderberger Guru
"Each
country also belongs to the foreigner" (Pope Francis)
Compendium
by Fedoseev
(Анатолий
Павлович
Федосеев, 1910-2001),
compiled in 1982 (in Russian) based on the 5 books below:
Gary Allen, "None dare call it
conspiracy" (full text)
Quigley,
"Tragedy and Hope"
Gary
Allen, "The Rockefeller's File"
Gary
Allen, "Kissinger"
Robert
Eringer, "The Global Manipulators"
http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/marxist-infiltration-in-america-virtually-complete/
The Frankfurt
School, or the Marxism with a
pederast face
Socialism's infiltration into America really began with the Frankfurt School,
according to Sasser.
This collection of Marxist intellectuals fled Nazi Germany and settled in New
York’s Columbia University in 1935.
This long march through the institutions has been going on a long time; it’s
virtually complete.
So here I am being pessimistic, I think it may be too late. And I'm
supposed to be optimistic, but I can't be. I’m a historian, so I look at this
and say, "It's too late".
Who stole our
culture: the origin of the "cultural Marxism" – by William S.
Lind
http://wnd.com/2018/03/who-owns-the-future-globalists-or-nationalists/
(Pat Buchanan)
This free-trade,
open-borders cult first flowered in 19th-century Britain. The St. Paul of this
post-Christian faith was Richard Cobden, who mesmerized elites with the
grandeur of his vision and the power of his rhetoric. In Free Trade Hall in
Manchester, Jan. 15, 1846, the crowd was so immense the seats had to be
removed. There, Cobden thundered:
“I look farther; I see in the Free Trade principle which shall act on the
moral world as the principle of gravitation in the universe – drawing men
together, thrusting aside the antagonisms of race, and creed, and language, and
uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace.”
https://wnd.com/2021/04/corporations-getting-woke-going-green/
- Who are promoters of NWO
|
"The trouble with our modern world is that too many people think too much. It is the cause of all our current fears and doubts. An enlightened citzenry should abandon the superstitious worship of logic and the outmoded reliance on reason. Just as laymen leave medicine to doctors and electronics to engineers, so people who are not qualified to think should leave all thinking to the experts and have faith in the experts' higher authority. Only experts are able to understand the discoveries of modern science, which have proved that thought is an illusion and that the mind is a myth." Dr. Robert Stadler,
from "Atlas Shurgged." |
https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2020/08/03/86505-zabludilis-v-treh-narrativah-diskussiya
Юлия
Латынина,
"Заблудились
в трех нарративах."