Re: My reply
to the article http://newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin942.htm
Thank you for reading my article and taking efforts to reply. I am
writing this to those of you which disapproved my article for various
reasons (or feelings).
I objected Mr. Baldwin's article solely
because of his loud and proud anti-Zionism.
Anti-Zionism singles out one particular people (of all), denies their
right for having a national home, and even curses their political
movement (Zionism) for daring
to have the national home.
Israel and Israelites are the only nation and
people on this planet whose
right for existence is questioned!
Please mind you: in my objections to Mr. Baldwin I didn't complain
anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism saddens me, but I do not deny anybody's
right to dislike some entire people for their ethnicity or religion (as
far as such feelings stay in a bay of civility). Nor was my
article to settle any religious differences or libels. It's your
However it is a gross injustice bordering with savagery to deny Jews
(only Jews!) their right for national home, and to demean Zionism as
though anything less than Frenchism or Germanism, or worse: to present
Zionism as something negative!
In so doing some of you are not even embarrassed that you borrow your
arguments from Soviet Politburo!
And you are not embarrassed that you borrow your anti-Zionist arguments
from ... the NWO! Yes, from
those very NWO and the former USSR for which you blame the Jews! Don't
The most visible and tangible organizations created by the NWO are the
Nations and the European Union
indeed, the organizations which we
(conservatives) obviously dislike. Yet exactly these two organizations
are the main promoters of anti-Zionism (and the UN being
mostly preoccupied with
it). You are in a "good company",
OK, you dislike Jews. You may even wish to encourage Jews to leave.
After all, any nation X belongs to people X. I can admit that a
Christian nation may wish to have less Jews and have nothing to do with
Judaism. American Founding Fathers didn't think so, but you may. It's
You may wish to have less Jews (yet in the same time more
moslems). Sounds strange (or even suicidal) but hey, its your nation...
Just let in even more moslems –
and the Jews will get your hint beginning to pack up their
Then, if this is your wish, which
sense does it make for you to
de-legitimize and harm Israel? How are you going to rid of Jews
place to go? Should I really develop this train of thoughts further?
But again, thank you for reading and sharing your thoughts with me.
Rebuttal for some arguments of anti-Zionists
1) You grossly misuse the term Zionism (meaning whichever you
dislike), and you speak loosely about Jews in general not
distinguishing religious from merely ethnic Jews, trying to trace down
Jewish ethnicity in participants of many nefarious affairs in this
world. I wonder would you do the same, trying to trace other
ethnicities in affairs that you dislike? Would you trace say Irish, or
say Italians for something? Say, would it come to your mind to blame
Italians for Mussolini, or for the founder of neo-Marxism Gromsky, or
even ... dare I to say ... for execution of Jesus by the Romans, and
for terrible martyrdom of Christians in Roman circuses?
Yet your compilations are a mixture of some facts, tales, and libels
against one particular people traced down by their ethnic roots, whom
you single out and blame as solely responsible for Communism, the New World Order (NWO), and
similar... Let's take a look closer.
2) You claim as though "Zionist brought us Communism and are the
driving force behind the NWO".
I happened to know something about the NWO –
see my outline.
The NWO was founded by Cecil Rhodes and further evolved led by many
various peoples. Though some presence of Jews is visible also there, it
is not a Jewish (much less a Zionist!) enterprise. In fact, in the
modern times, the NWO and its main creatures such as the UN and
European Union are vehemently anti-Zionist.
3) Now about "Jewish Bolshevik revolution" in Russia and the hell that
followed. This is a "well developed field" of Russian vile
anti-Semites, attempting to shift the blame for 70 years of communist
hell in the former USSR exclusively on Jews (never more than some 2% of
the citizenry). Of those 2% then in 1917 the most were extremely poor,
politically illiterate, and inactive, living only in the designated
areas far away from big cities. Those folks became an easy victims of
pogroms from both Red and Whites during the Civil war.
Yes, at the very beginning there was a visibly disproportional number
of top Bolsheviks of ethnic Jewish origin, having nothing to do
with Zionism. The goal of Zionism was restoration of the state of
Israel on the historic homeland –
something totally antithetical to Bolshevism, which ignored ethnic (and
national) allegiances replacing them with the allegiance to the world
proletarians. Bolsheviks despised and fought both secular Zionists and
religious Jews. Religious Jews were antithetical to Socialism because
Socialism is antithetical to Torah. Only secular Jews (deprived of any
cultural or religious roots) were allowed to survive in the USSR then.
However already before the WWII Stalin began purging those "Jews" from
all positions of power. In the 1950s Stalin set a kangaroo trials
against the so called "cosmopolitan" Jews which had changed their names
eager to assimilate and bland in. After that, Stalin arranged
persecution of prominent Jewish doctors, and in 1953 he planned a huge
action of total deportation of all Jews of the USSR to their sure death
in far damned corners of the GULAG. Only a death of the tyrant
prevented realization of this horrifying plan.
After Stalin not only the Soviets kept the policy of "affirmative
actions" against Jews of the USSR, but they also were the main supplier
of arms and the "designer" of the so called "Palestinian liberation
organization" (PLO) training Arafat and his terrorists. It was Soviets
which introduced the disparaging usage of the term Zionism (equating it with fascism).
Even for Nazis (before the 1940s) the term Zionism did not have negative
connotation. Before the "Final solution" they considered possibilities
to deport all Jews into their historic homeland (then called