Who is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America

A "Natural born citizen" is a concept belonging to Natural Law, which became the most controversial in the moment (2008). This concept is used in the Constitution of the
US (Article II, Section 1, #4) as a precondition for presidency – and only for presidency, as enhanced citizenship clearly distinguished from ordinary citizenship. It has not been defined in the Constitution nor in any later statutes, because it had been self evident in the time when the Constitution was written, codified in the then contemporary encyclopedia "Law of Nations" (1758) by Emerich de Vattel. (As a legal source, "Law of Nations" is mentioned in Article I, Section 8, #10 of the Constitution in respect to the authority of the US Congress to enforce the law of nations, in particular – against piracies and felonies on high seas).

According to Chapter 19, §212 of "Law of Nations", "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens". The concept "Natural born citizen" is a twofold criterion meaning that: 


Both parents must be the citizens of the country, and the birth must take place in the country, assuming that the citizenship inherited by this child and the loyalty are never changed ever after.

In other words, a natural born citizen means at least a second generation citizen of the country. Vattel's own note on the margin  of his book refers to the Roman law: NEMO
PLUS JURIS TRANSFERRE POTEST, QUAM IPSE HABET, meaning "No one can give more rights than he himself has" (by Dr. A. Altec). Except for Obama/Soetoro, the Vattel definition had been always presumed up to the US Senate resolution 511 in 2008 (also here and here) acknowledging Sen. McCain as though a natural born citizen.

Indeed, the goal of the Sen. Res. 511 was not to refresh the brain dead America about the concept of the US Natural Born as defined in Law of Nations by Vattel. Its goal was merely to justify campaigning of McCain (which did not qualify because he was born in Panama's hospital rather than on American soil or an area under American jurisdiction). In doing so, the authors inadvertently revealed what they knew and kept in mind – the two-fold requirement of the definition of Vattel, though not mentioning it explicitly. (See below how the US Congress had tried to rid of this Constitutional requirementfor presidency years prior to emergence of Obama).  

The Supreme Court has acknowledged "Natural Born" as born to citizen parents on American soil four times, or in four different decisions, in our history: 1814, 1830, 1875, and 1898. In each case, the justices referred to Vattel's Law of Nations, clearly understanding our founding fathers' source and intent in adding these requirements to our Constitution for President and Vice President, and copied the applicable passages out of Vattel's book in their opinions (Farile). For example, it was acknowledged as a side ruling in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 1875. It is a side acknowledgment because the case was not about a qualification of the plaintiff for presidency.

So far (2008), no case directly questioning qualification of a presidential contender had ever been filed or heard, and for quite obvious reasons. Before 2008 the parties promoting presidential contenders, the Congress, and state secretaries had always followed and upheld the Vattel concept of the Natural born so there was no need for court hearings.

What happened in 2008 and 2012 was the first incident of such a violation committed by both parties, all secretaries of states, electoral college, and the US Congress. Many court cases had been filed, but sabotaged or grossly misjudged. A few of them (filed by Dr. Taitz) had reached the Supreme court and were sabotaged too.

It had been presumed and practiced, that the enforcement of the constitutional requirements and vetting of presidential contenders must happen within the competing political parties. Then presidential contenders submitted their party backed applications to state secretaries in every state, and the secretaries ought to verify the papers against the constitutional requirements. However for Obama, the Democrat party (with silent agreement and cooperation of Republican and other parties) submitted, and all the secretaries of states accepted the forged documents and applications for candidacy invalid on their face – as this outline describes. Since then denial and obfuscation of every aspect of the illegal presidency became as though a taboo.

In obfuscating public discussion, often enough the Natural born citizenship was (deliberately) confused with acts of naturalization of common law, say with  §1401 of the US Code "Nationals and citizens of United States at birth". Although the words sound similar, §1401 defines only ordinary citizenship including such shallow one as that of anchor babies (i.e. born to legal guests of the country, §1401(a), never mind illegal residents).

The Constitution clearly and explicitly excludes ordinary citizenship for presidency: ordinary citizenship was reserved only for the presidential candidates – contemporaries of the Framers (referred as the grandfather clause). This fact alone indicates that the "Natural born citizenship" is not the same as ordinary citizenship, but something stronger. However, by not explicitly quoting the Vattel's definition, the Constitution therefore leaves some room for confusions(*).

The Framers (in their correspondence) explicitly wished to exclude dual loyalty, and explicitly required that the
US citizenship of the president be stronger than ordinary citizenship (such as that of their contemporaries). After all, any one can acquire an ordinary US citizenship (via naturalization) in some point of one's life, so the Framers clearly excluded this kind of citizenship. On the contrary, the Natural Born Citizenship cannot be acquired: it may be only inherited.


After the Framers, all the presidential contenders prior to 2008 did officially satisfy this definition, demonstrating continuity of the meaning "Natural born citizenship" consistent with that of Vattel . (In the past only one President Chester Arthur 1881-1885 violated it, hiding and destroying the traces of the British citizenship of his father, discovered only after Chester Arthur's death. The carefully hidden violation of Chester Arthur in fact is an additional argument that the Vattel's definition was valid and he was aware of it).


The continuity and understanding of the Vattel meaning of the Natural born citizenship held intact since the Founders up to 2008. Not only was it well understood, but some legislators disliked what they well understood, because the Vattel's definition stood on the way of certain "planers" long before emergence of Obama. Already since 2002 some members of the US Congress (Democrats and Republicans both) had made many attempts to rid of the concept Natural Born Citizen, which all have failed (here, here, here, and here – the research of J.B. Williams). Here is the list of those attempts:


H.J.R. 33 (1975) 
H.J.R. 38 (1977)
H.J.R 59 (2003)
H.J.R. 67 (2003)
S.2128 (2004)
H.J.R. 104 (2004)
H.J.R. 2 (2005)
H.J.R. 15 (2005)
H.J.R. 42  (2005)
S.2678 (2008).

Therefore in 2008 and 2012, by approving Obama's presidency, all branches of the US government simply violated the Constitution, created a precedent and therefore de-facto have changed the Constitution without any due constitutional process. It was "The Audacity of Dope", rephrasing the notorious book title.


Contrary to the case of Arthur in the 19th century, in 2008 nobody even attempted to hide the foreign citizenship of Obama's biological father – an open into the face overt violation of the Constitution. Worse, no personal documents of Obama at all have been ever verified. The perpetrators and enablers have been the media, both big and all the small parties, plus the three branches of government, who overlooked and orchestrated ascendance of the impostor into the White House – while the majority of American people didn't care, were hoodwinked, or brain dead.  


This brain dead crowd still maintains the consensus of silencing and suppression of the truth, cheering the procession and wonderful clothes of the proverbial Emperor without clothes, while the cheer leaders keep an eye on those attempting to speak out the truth. 

The former bright city on the hill turned into a despicable laughing stock for the entire world;

Into a chess board with the situation of checkmate, yet the winning side refraining to checkmate;

Into a poker game against a brazen bluffer whom nobody ever demanded to open his cards.



1) With only one parent American citizen (the mother) and the father – a foreigner (according to the official bio), Obama/Soetoro is definitely not a natural born citizen no matter where he was born and what was in his hidden full birth certificate.  

2) His Indonesian upbringing and citizenship had abrogated his natural born American citizenship (if it were valid). Getting back to America he might become only a naturalized citizen: definitely not natural born

3) Obama's authentic birth certificate at best can only prove him to be an ordinary U.S. citizen according to §1401(a): definitely not a natural born U.S. citizen. (Fixation on his hidden birth certificate was misguiding, just like the pejorative term "birther", invented by those who want to deflect attention from the obvious issues lying on the very surface and not requiring any birth certificate).

4) On the top of it, Obama is a plain fraudster . He had obtained an invalid Social Security number 042-68-4425, that he currently uses. It was issued in the state of CT to an individual born in 1890. Obama illegally assumed this number, as Dr. Taitz and her collaborators have discovered. His 2011 copy of the full birth certificate appeared to be a coarse forgery. The head of the Hawaii department of Health Ms. Loretta Fuddy who provided Obama with this coarse forgery of the BC in 2011, happened to be the only victim of a non-fatal (staged?) plane crash on water in 2013. She died (and was hastily cremated) while nobody was even injured.

See also http://puzo1.blogspot.com  Mario Apuzzo, Esq

http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams300.htm   (J.B. Williams, End of American Presidency)

(*)  There was only one occasion when the term Natural Born Citizenship was spelled out, though in inappropriate place – in a legislation concerning the Naturalization law in the 1st Congress Act of 1790. As this Natural Law term slipped into a section of the common law of naturalization erroneously, it was repealed already in the 1795 Act and never reused again with such a purpose.